Amil04 wrote: ..to clarify, it’s called being wrong..not ‘pushing an outright lie to further position.’ It was a way of bringing the diesel issue into the conversation. I don’t think any friend would intentionally lie but ..ar..forget it.
Sorry, but that's just horseshit.
Where did "diesel only" plant come from. Someone said that phrase and it was a LIE when they said it. There's no possible way of somehow "mixing up a plant that's 6% diesel with one that's diesel-only".
Explain to me how that "mistake" was made please. Because otherwise it's a lie. And I'm fucking tired of tip-toeing around liars on important political and ecological issues. if you post something to a public forum, have the decency to check it's true.
If you can't be arsed to do that; then don't get miffed if people think you're lying.
EDIT: *Especially* on subjects where LOTS of people clearly ARE lying in public.
|