slumpystones wrote: nigelswift wrote: I thought a number of us had, but I'm reluctant to reiterate it as voicing it seems to be taken as an unfriendly act and I can do without further upset.
I can do that, I've calmed down a bit now ;)
There are three main reasons:
It sets a precedent, one that could be used by any number of groups with a greater affiliation to another site. For instance, Pagans may choose to bury their cremated fellowship in a site they feel particularly close to, or Trottiscliffe school, itself in danger of being closed, could decide that Coldrum needs a time capsule. Who could then deny them that right?
It is pointless. The media coverage and recording of the contents mean there will never be a point to digging it up. Archaeologists will probably not be interested in something they can click on and view online, or view photos and scans of in a local museum.
It goes against everything English Heritage stand for - to protect and conserve - and therefore undermines their position.
If I've missed one out, or offended anyone, I apologise.
Cheers for clearing that up, Slumps.
|