Littlestone wrote: Well they didn't put it on the site, but at least I got a reply:
Excellent letters slumpy! (English Heritage didn't really reply to you with "Dear Mr Angry Bastard" did they :-)
No, but that was the persona I took on for the duration - it beats being called Anglegrinder Man as I have been elsewhere!
I still find their lack of clarity on every issue frustrating. They seem to think the complaint is that the hill will be less stable, totally overlooking any realistic objections. Of course the hill will not be any less stable having a barrel stuck inside, so it's another smokescreen.
Maybe everyone should apply to insert something into Silbury, giving equally good reasons for doing so, and accepting no rejection from EH. Maybe when there are a thousand time capsules they might stop and reconsider.
|