Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge Solstice: is there a risk?
Log In to post a reply

102 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Mustard
1043 posts

Re: Stonehenge Solstice: is there a risk?
Jul 20, 2010, 14:40
nigelswift wrote:
"That's fine Nige. But your argument then becomes a moral argument rather than a conservation argument."

Not at all. The image of idiots dancing on our national icon without our statutory guardian preventing it is bound to impact negatively upon the attitude of the public to all ancient sites - with the attendant conservation implications. In simple terms it's a case of "Who cares what we do at sites, EH doesn't". That's a PURE conservation matter.

.... and supposition. I've never met anyone that draws any such conclusion. With respect, you're reading into it what you want to see. In no way is that demonstrable fact. In fact, by referring to such people as "idiots", you're immediately entering the realm of subjective moral judgement. It's quite possible that they simply don't appreciate the reasons why others may consider their behaviour inappropriate or damaging, so labelling them "idiots" is reactionary and unnecessary. Being poorly informed does not make a person an "idiot".

nigelswift wrote:
No, there's no way round this. Showing respect is an integral and essential component of conservation.

The problem is, 'respect' is an abstract concept, and different people will define it, well, differently.
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index