Julian Cope presents Head Heritage | The Modern Antiquarian Forum | Prehistoric stone row

The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Prehistoric stone row - or collapsed modern wall?	Log In to post a reply

117 messages	Topic View: Flat \| Threaded

Rhiannon

5291 posts

Re: a whinger writes

Mar 11, 2005, 14:09

So the reason why we don't have a 'dodgy site area' - is that just because we don't need one? or is there an element of apathy, and it actually would be a good thing. I don't really know.

And about the wells. I suppose TMA is a bit fuzzy around the edges. And I don't think that's a bad thing, because that's what makes it what it is and not a Very Serious thing (oh it's a serious thing, I don't dispute). you can't deny some wells (like rivers and impressive hills and crags) are close to prehistoric sites. So you can only (bar actual finds) 'infer' their importance. Maybe sometimes that's convincing enough, maybe sometimes it isn't relevant at all...

so perhaps this place is self-policing enough? as people already pick up on dodgy sites. But I suppose it all depends whether posters admit they are dodgy.

(bad sound:noise ratio sorry)

In reply to:
Re: a whinger writes (BrigantesNation)

Replies:
Re: a whinger writes (Kammer)

Topic Outline:

Prehistoric stone row - or collapsed modern wall? – enkidu41, Mar 09, 2005, 10:05


The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index