Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Natural or Induced?
Log In to post a reply

121 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: Natural or Induced? Pickering to Wheeldale
Aug 27, 2012, 19:25
thesweetcheat wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
thesweetcheat wrote:
Up to a point. I think the idea of mass-migration has been largely discounted and that current thinking is that the evidence points to smaller scale movement of people, goods and ideas. Same with the "Celts".


Well any form of migration in time builds up into a mass in quantity if it is a constant flow. Beaker pottery has been found pretty well most places in southern parts indicating a large influx over a period of time.


Plentiful Beaker pottery doesn't necessary mean thousands of migrant people though, does it? It only takes a few people to bring the ideas of the type of pottery and the method of cremation, which can then be adopted by the "indigenous" people. I'm not suggesting there was no movement of people, but I don't think there's any evidence to show that the existing pre-Beaker population of the south of England was replaced by an incoming "race".


We don't have the aDNA evidence from Britain ,yet , but we do for the continent and it shows an incursion of haplogroup R1b along with the beaker package providing the final dominant group that replaced much of the Neolithic haplogroups numerically , reflecting the present distribution . As R1b is dominant in Britain today as well as Europe , it could mean that only the pottery and culture came here and not the genes and the Neolithic population here were mainly R1b , but this seems very unlikely as R1b has been shown to have from the east and why should the Neolithic Brits avoid what the rest of Europe experienced and probably wanted .
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index