Jane wrote: I assume one of the two secularists you refer to is me, moss; if so you'd be right :-) I don't get into a 'blithering rage' though, I merely assert that religious privilege, in whatever guise it manifests itself, should be challenged. Just as any unfairness or prejudice should be challenged.
As religion requires a god (there aren't any) and faith in something there is no evidence for, atheism cannot be a religion. I quite admire the new religion of pastafarianism though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster ;-)
Anyway, I'm very aware that this thread is now completely off topic. So I'd better shut up or I'll get into trouble.
Also entirely with you and NS here, and if there's secularist blacklist (or pie chart) I want to be on it.
:-)
Alken
|