You're right. Dawkins is very much a fundamentalist. It's all fish-in-barrels with him. He is incapable of understanding that 'God' ie. a ficitious judaeo/christian/islamic anthropormorphic ('male') figure in the sky, is an entirely and totally unnecessary, vastly over simplistic view of spirituality/gnosis etc, be it western hermetic or eastern in tradition. His argument stands purely on the 'god' concept. Beyond that, he is utterly out of his depth and has nothing to say.