Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge »
New study challenges timeline
Log In to post a reply

213 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
bladup
bladup
1986 posts

Re: New study challenges timeline
Dec 03, 2012, 12:37
nigelswift wrote:
It comes down to what you want I suppose.

Personally i regret the Lizard era and I've heard TMA spoken of disparagingly by archies quite recently on the grounds that it was full of that sort of stuff.

It's quite a thought that very few pros come here openly (Mike Pitts was the last I think) yet there's a huge and healthy public interest in prehistory here.
We can grumble that they are arrogant as they don't descend from their Ivory towers to outreach and engage with that public interest. Or we can ask - WHY don't they.

Personally, I'd rather Tim Darvill et al popped in here sometimes than the lizard lot or their more recent successors. But no doubt I,m a very bad, closed minded person for having such a preference. And I'm certainly in a minority.


They'd only come on here if they've got something to sell.
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index