=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge »
New study challenges timeline
Log In to post a reply
213 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
bladup
bladup
1986 posts

Re: New study challenges timeline
Dec 01, 2012, 17:30
The professionals aren't about facts anymore [if they ever were!!!], it's all about making a name for yourself and saying things that'll get you in the press, Darvell is clearly saying stuff that's against the grain to make a name for himself not give us facts. Like Tiompan say's it's bollocks to say the sarsens were there before the bluestones if the bluestones stood somewhere else first anyway, you have to know where the stones actually stood to give any sequence at all. I bet we know more than those so called experts, they just dig and dig til there's nothing left, the middle of Stonehenge shows this as well as anywhere, it's been dug that badly that there's nothing left for the future - And a time when people would be able to tell everyone everything about the site, but no, philistines have wrecked the place for there own shitty means and to make names for themselves, [Hawley, Atkinson and Piggott were the same as well], it would be great to end this moan by saying they should leave it to the future but like i said there's not much that between them they haven't already wrecked.
In reply to:
Re: New study challenges timeline (Littlestone)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index