It's a shame that he's appears generally rather clueless and ill informed about the more subtle approach to spiritual philosophy that does not require an anthropomorphic being in the sky. Fish and barrels, but hey, he's a brand now. To be honest, if I was an Atheist, which I'm not, and neither am I a Deist, I'd find him rather embarrassing. Also, he's not entirely scientific or fair at times:
http://www.sheldrake.org/D&C/controversies/Dawkins.html
|