head-first wrote: Thanks for the link - I hadn't seen that clip! It's possible that a negative result would mean very little to a dowser, since their beliefs appear to be justified by non-empirical means from the start. The failure can be rationalised without undermining their confidence in a practice which is largely intuitive and esoteric.
You're right about Dawkins. For some people he's nothing more than a kind of fundamentalist sceptic.
So often in these vids the dowsers who fail do appear to have their confidence severely detted , they expect to succeed and are surprised to fail .
The failures do tend to get ignored by the faithful but the problems are greater than just an inability by the "talented " to come up with the goods .
Yes ,Dawkins has an unlikeable personality and the "selfish gene " hypothesis has big problems but that shouldn't cloud our judgement over what he has to say re. dowsing or pseudoscience in general . I don't have any problem with scepticism per se it's the quality of the argument that matters .
|