=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Sites...but no info
Log In to post a reply
133 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
SwastikaGirl
16 posts

Re: Sites...but no info
Sep 29, 2006, 16:02
Hello again

Apologies accepted on the name Goffik. However:

< whatisthat wrote:
Looking forward to the answer to this one.

Not sure there is one. >

Utter rubbish. There are obviously reasons why the editor has put Disputed Antiquity signs on them all. The individual concerned took time out to go through each site and labeled each one accordingly. It was meticulous. Hence there is a reason. The person thought it through and labeled them due to a particular bias or loss of logic. It’s quite simple. Exactly that person did such a thing is an anomaly. As whatisthat enquired quite politely:

< Looking forward to the answer to this one >

It would be nice to know, so then I can at least ensure that any cited parameters regarding the placement of holy wells here are maintained.

Many thanks - SG
In reply to:
Re: Sites...but no info (goffik)		 Replies:
Re: Sites...but no info (goffik)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index