Julian Cope presents Head Heritage | The Modern Antiquarian Forum

Littlestone

5386 posts

Re: Sites...but no info

Sep 29, 2006, 15:19

Putting aside whether or not wells merit a mention here (and for what it's worth I think they do) you might be unaware that people using the swastika (in one way or another) have caused considerable offence and disruption on TMA over the last year or so - to the point when they were finally banned. If you want to incorporate that word in your name that's your prerogative, just don't be surprised if you find that it causes offence, negative feelings and possible confusion with others. It may be a sacred symbol but in my humble opinion it is not a sacred word - my advice to you is to change it to one of its variants - FylfotGirl springs to mind.

As for your comment that, "Wells are predominantly female in nature, while most of the contributors here are male and don’t relate to the nature of healing springs." I find that comment both ridiculous and sexist. "Wells are predominately female"? Please explain. And, "...most of the contributors here are male and don’t relate to the nature of healing springs."

Oh dear, I think I must resort to a male-ism - bollocks.

In reply to:
Re: Sites...but no info (SwastikaGirl)

Replies:
Re: Sites...but no info (whatisthat)
Re: Sites...but no info (Moth)

The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Sites...but no info	Log In to post a reply

133 messages	Topic View: Flat \| Threaded