Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge and its Environs »
The bluestone debate
Log In to post a reply

390 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: The bluestone debate
Dec 06, 2008, 14:53
mountainman wrote:
tiompan wrote:
Stoneshifter wrote:
Another profitable line of enquiry is to investigate other sites which incorporate stones from outside their immediate area. Long Meg is the most obvious one that I can think of. The stone was probably dragged a dozen miles, at the most.


The recumbent at Old Keig weighs over 40 tons , is not local and was dragged uphill , total distance about 3 miles .




Can't hear you MM .
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index