Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge and its Environs »
The bluestone debate
Log In to post a reply

390 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tonyh
247 posts

Edited Nov 26, 2008, 17:49
Re: The bluestone debate
Nov 22, 2008, 21:44
tonyh wrote:
The Watchman wrote:
tonyh wrote:
As I said elsewhere. It was not my intention to stir it up.. Unlike Mr Watchman above..


On the contrary. I am just reporting facts.

You have a track record. You have admitted that you came looking for trouble. The quotes I used were verbatim.

The additional post you made on the Avebury forum was a day later than the quotes I posted. The "PS" was added later still. Maybe you remembered it was a public forum.

I am not here to "stir it up", merely to report the facts.


Yea right W..

Duh..

I have just made a public apology..

Trying to make more of it - is a joke.

As I said.. there are People here. That would prefer me not to be..

My God Man, do you not not believe I don't know who you are..

I apologized to Steve because I was wrong Wrong, wrong, wrong..

Lisen... Fool..

I will say it again I was wrong. I Made a mistake

You, Mr.. lets just call you N.. are trying to stir it up ..

Tony


I have been quite clear about what happened. Naievly I did not know This Forum. The one I was posting on was so public.. Do you think I would even think of saying such things if I did..

You Mr N are trying, as before to stir trouble... Tis why We don't get on..

I dislike you and your kind. You are rubish..

But hey Mr W don't sweat it..

Tony
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index