Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge and its Environs »
The bluestone debate
Log In to post a reply

390 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Steve Gray
Steve Gray
931 posts

Re: The bluestone debate
Nov 19, 2008, 21:12
GordonP wrote:
I thought you might find the following of interest. This is taken from a paper presented to The British Academy by archaeologist Julian Richards and engineer Mark Whitby.

"Whatever the precise route, the varied nature of the terrain, with undulating topography and potentially wet areas, helps dictate the approach to the development of a method of transportation. In this development a number of ideas were considered including the use of rollers, forming a timber cylinder around the stone and rolling it, Crabbing the stone along using levers and the use of ice as a medium across which the stone could be slid.

The orthodox method using rollers to move the stones was considered but rejected. Subsequent experiments in moving the 10 ton lintel proved that it is a practical system, but has limitations. The direction of the stone is difficult to control on all but the most level ground and the method involves high risk as rollers have to be placed ahead of the moving object. As the load goes up, the system becomes prone to binding as the weight of the whole load will at times bear on only one or two of the rollers due to uneveness either in the rollers or in the ground surface. The latter can be overcome by running the rollers on a flat, possibily timber track, and the former by selecting rollers of a uniform diameter. However, directional control remains an issue, as any roller placed out of true to the track will cause the load to veer off.


Yes, I've read that before (quite a long time ago).

As you may be aware Julian Richards was at Foamhenge and took a great interest in our project. He was especially impressed with Gordon Heeks' glass axe. I had a long chat with him on the day and later we corresponded by email about these very topics.

One of the ideas that came up was that a variable workforce may have been employed with a smaller number of men moving the stones over the easier sections of the route and a larger force being assembled as and when needed for the difficult parts.

However, Nigel's picture clearly dispells the myth that oxen are too difficult to handle in large teams and illustrates that they could easily have been a viable force for moving large stones by dragging them (probably on a wooden sled to avoid pecking) without rollers.

A sufficiently large team might even provide their own supply of lubrication en-route. ;o)
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index