=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge and its Environs »
The bluestone debate
Log In to post a reply
390 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Steve Gray
Steve Gray
931 posts

Re: The bluestone debate
Nov 18, 2008, 23:32
GordonP wrote:
verifiable examples.


"verifiable examples" to you too.

As I said, the only real first-hand example we both have is Foamhenge and we've been over that ad nauseum.

I know it's hard for you to swallow because you have invested so much time and effort in trying to prove the viability of your stone-rowing idea. I also invested a lot of time and effort in support of you, as did many others here, but faced both with rejection of that support and the overwhelming evidence of the day we accepted the obvious and moved on.

Of the people I know who were present at that demonstration, you are the only one who seems not to acknowledge the evidence of his own eyes, namely that dragging is a far more efficient way of moving large stones than stone-rowing.
In reply to:
Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP)		 Replies:
Re: The bluestone debate (GordonP)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index