=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge and its Environs »
The bluestone debate
Log In to post a reply
390 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
mountainman
90 posts

Re: The bluestone debate
Nov 15, 2008, 11:24
Sorry Nigel -- I thought we were supposed to be arguing out where the weight of evidence lies? All 4 theories can't be right -- at least not in their entirety. Probably what we'll end up with is a classic compromise, with ice doing some of the work and man the rest.

Would you not agree with me that the archaeology establishment has worked rather hard at making sure that their sacred cows remain sacred? Look at the way Kellaway and Williams-Thorpe were ignored and vilified by men who should have known better, just because they dared to question the established belief system of our leading archaeologists........ Richard Thorpe and his colleagues put forward meticulously researched geological evidence in 1991. They have never had the credit they deserved, for their contribution to a full understanding of Stonehenge.
In reply to:
Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift)		 Replies:
Re: The bluestone debate (nigelswift)
Re: The bluestone debate (Stoneshifter)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index