Maybe, maybe not.
If I said; Dowsers exist, but must prove their credibility on an individual basis to be of use.
Would that work for you?
If so then we are on the same track and I'm sorry for strapping the question.
In my view it is not the physics of how dowsing works that are so relevent. It is their interpretation by the dowser. If a dowser asks "is this water", but actually is thinking "is it coal" and the hole is dug and coal is discovered, does that caount as (1) a positive anomally, and (2) poor interpretation from the operator?
|