=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
The Jamie Oliver Swindle -
Log In to post a reply
64 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
sttomas
sttomas
1123 posts

Re: The Jamie Oliver Swindle -
Jan 31, 2008, 16:06
The 2012 theory was first developed by the Mayans thousands of years ago, although the mayan calender has been thought to have predicted many an event it is by no means something to set you're watch by as no one can actually understand it. It was first highlighted by the likes of Erik Von Daaniken and more recently Graham Hancock in his tedious tome "Fingerprints of the Gods". Hancock is pretty much reknown for jumping ship when a theory becomes unpopular and has been known to debunk his own work, which he has done in some of this book!

Furthermore the process used to extract the information was based upon our gregorian calender! Until the calender is understood perfectly there's very little point in mentioning anything that the calender is thought to predict as it's only scaremongering and has nothing to do with any science, or belief!

Lastly, I read a book by Percy Seymour a few years back, examining the birth of Jesus. According to the astrological patterns at the time it would be impossible for him to be born on Dec 25th 1CE, as told in the bible. If the nativity story is held as fact then Jesus would have to have been born in Sept 7BCE as that would have been the only time the "star of Bethlehem" would have been visible. If this is the case then our calenders are incorrect by 7 years therefore making the current 2012 theory rubbish as the exact 2012 would have been in our 2005!!

Funnily enough, we're still here!
In reply to:
Re: The Jamie Oliver Swindle - (mole)		 Replies:
Re: The Jamie Oliver Swindle - (handofdave)
Topic Outline:
U-Know! Forum Index