vivid wrote: On a more positive note, shouldn't 'the wider us' hatch a plot to buy the woodland from under their noses? If so, could we guarantee to keep the developers and hunters at bay?
Trouble is, "the wider us" is the Forestry Commission, which was effectively set up "to keep the developers and hunters at bay". We couldn't possibly afford it but if we did we'd be buying what's ours to prevent a cabinet of millionaires flogging it to their millionaire mates.
|