=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Log In to post a reply
225 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
goffik
goffik
3926 posts

Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Jun 28, 2007, 08:30
Howdy!

Paulus wrote:
But even that doesn't work! When I lived & worked at the Rollrights 24/7 on and off over a 2 year period, there was still plenty of crap to clean up each and every day - 10 times more from the tourists than any visiting pagans. Though the latter group did leave some damn good lumps of crystal over the period! (but I gave 'em all away).


Aye - but at least it informs people of what they're not SUPPOSED to do - if they see some pile of old candles and stuff on a monument, they'll not see anything wrong with it and possibly add more cack. But if they KNOW it's wrong, they're more likely to think "tsk!" and not add their own cack, or even clear the existing cack. Possibly.

Well, it's not a bad thing to educate people in these things, regardless, is it?

G x
In reply to:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus)		 Replies:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus)
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index