=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Log In to post a reply
225 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
CianMcLiam
CianMcLiam
1067 posts

Edited Jun 27, 2007, 10:23
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Jun 27, 2007, 10:22
Mustard wrote:
Whoops. Left a bit of your text on the end of that last post, sorry! My comments ended at "If truths were objective and self-evident, we'd always agree on everything!"


Not at all, it's usually self interests and self delusions that cause 'disagreements'. Your starting to sound like Bill O'Reilly & co. on Fox News, when someone states a verifiable fact they retort 'well that's your opinion' before moving on to something else.

There's property you own, property you dont and property you share, you modify your behaviour accordingly. It seems people want to treat ancient sites like their own personal property, it just is not. It's shared and should be respected in this way, no personal stamps of ownership or tokens of your visit unless there's a very good reason. I haven't heard a good reason yet why others should leave visual/material pollution that was not there before they arrived.
In reply to:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard)		 Replies:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard)
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Lubin)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index