=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Log In to post a reply
225 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Paulus
Paulus
769 posts

Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Jun 27, 2007, 15:05
Littlestone wrote:
Aww c'mon. Cut this crap attitude out. This fella has, from the start, been civil, courteous, stated his position, asked others of theirs, questioned it lucidly, openly, asked what folk meant in terms of their own parameters, found things wanting, etc.


Courteous? I think not.

And is this courteous? From your own TMA profile when you know full well that there are contributors to this Forum who are pagan-druids?

"After searching thru' many weird & wondrous mythologies exploring these old stones & their animistic compatriots, it's blatantly obvious many of these places were spots used by that common character found the world over: the shaman. (And please don't get any ideas about the modern New-Age shamans [or pagan-druids for that matter] being owt like the real thing, cos they're not: they're shams not shamans!)"


Stick to the point of the thread. You're gerrin personal, so I'm mirroring. You're simply a troll LittleStone! Stay where you belong you troll.

...And yes, show where Mustard's been discourteous. C'mon troll, I'm sure you'd like to...
In reply to:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Littlestone)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index