"I don't think that a statement of ownership is inherent in such actions - simply inferred."
I disagree profoundly. To impose your own physical statement on a place and then leave - a place that cannot be seen as other than "everyone's" - just can't be interpreted as fair to others. I'm not saying a bit of give and take isn't the obvious solution but I do think it should be seen as that not seen as a compromise between two equally valid views.
This all reminds me of the metal detecting debate. "We'll do what we want, and not think about the impact on others". "If its a communal resource, its mine".
You can tell me I have no right to impose "my" contrary view, to which I would answer "let them show how I'm wrong"....
If a person plays loud music or shouts while there
|