=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Log In to post a reply
225 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
slumpystones
769 posts

Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Jun 27, 2007, 14:02
nigelswift wrote:
"not what most people, in my opinion, want to see at any SAM."

And that's the clincher.

If it was put to the vote it would come out "no littering in a public place thankyou" and no amount of looking in the dictionary would change it.


Tonbridge and Malling council made a big deal about roadside flowers for deceased pedestrians, claiming it was unsightly, messy, smelly, and non-perishable. The same rule should apply, with a little commonsense.
In reply to:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (nigelswift)		 Replies:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index