=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Log In to post a reply
225 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Paulus
Paulus
769 posts

Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use?
Jun 27, 2007, 14:35
Littlestone wrote:
Have we reached the part that Paulus was talking about where you accuse me of being a troll?

Not quite, but we're getting there.

Now, to reassure us that you're not a troll, why don't you tell us which areas of the megalithic subject you're interested in, or have some degree of knowledge about; it's quite a simple question really and will clarify whether you're in the right place or would be happier in one of the internet semantic forums ;-)


Aww c'mon. Cut this crap attitude out. This fella has, from the start, been civil, courteous, stated his position, asked others of theirs, questioned it lucidly, openly, asked what folk meant in terms of their own parameters, found things wanting, etc. Nowt wrong with that. He's stuck to the point aswell. Now you wanna change it. Stick to the point or start another thread. Don't start the troll crap. (told y' Mustard - very predicatable those of little minds...)
In reply to:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Littlestone)		 Replies:
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard)
Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Littlestone)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index