=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge and its Environs »
FOAMHENGE
This topic is locked
219 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Ishmael
683 posts

Re: FOAMHENGE
Jun 23, 2005, 00:44
I thought PT2 was naff when Clive & Mike trashed Gerald Hawkins' and dismissed his findings as a coincidence.
They then went on to demonstrate how accurate it was for sunrise/set at solstice and moonstandstill but used a light. They had the chance to film the real thing!

In Pt 1 the stonerowing would have been more impressive if they started us rowing at the begining of the day and check every now and then to see how far the stone had travelled.
At the end of the day it would have covered an impressive distance.
Rowing it back and forward for the camera was a waste of time.
Altho the foamhenge had a few of Pitts' nutty ideas (3 slaughter stones standing, blue stone blocking the big trilathon and nowhere for the alter stone....)
As Beetlejuice said "Nice fucking model!"
In reply to:
Re: FOAMHENGE (Moth)		 Replies:
Re: FOAMHENGE (RombaldII)
Re: FOAMHENGE (Steve Gray)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index