=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
Four more years?
Log In to post a reply
104 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
grufty jim
grufty jim
1978 posts

Re: Kerry's fault
Nov 03, 2004, 17:58
Humbug!

Sorry LL, but I don't believe for a moment it's Kerry's fault. The democrats should have been able to nominate a half-eaten can of skipjack tuna as their candidate and still won by a landslide in any sane nation.

The world has endured four years of having a _bona-fide_ imbecile in charge of all the bombs. And America has voted (over half of a large turnout) to continue that state of affairs.

So it clearly didn't matter who the democrats put up. The people who voted Bush would have voted that way even if Kerry *had* been Mr. Charisma... even if Dick Cheney personally took a dump on their doorstep.

Bush's supporters didn't vote for him because Kerry didn't excite them. They voted for him because they bought into his whole 'Good Vs. Evil' Schtick. They voted for him because he's gonna put an end to the murderous practice of abortion... because he's gonna make sure the American family isn't shaken to it's very core by gay marriage... and because - despite plunging the world deeper into violence following September 11th 2001, instead of drawing us back from it, making the whole planet a more extreme, hateful and dangerous place - Dubya is firm, resolute, and clearly a man of God.

Bush didn't win the election. Kerry didn't lose it. The US public simply demonstrated that more than half of them are completely mad.
In reply to:
Kerry's fault (Lord Lucan)		 Replies:
brace yourselves... (dave clarkson)
Re: Kerry's fault (Dog 3000)
Re: Kerry's fault (laresident)
Topic Outline:
U-Know! Forum Index