Littlestone wrote: tiompan wrote: Have you read EDG's more recent post and my prior reply regarding any implications being in the mind of the beholder and not logically applicable to Roman temple dedications and therefore not a consideration ?
Yes, alternatively we might argue that clarity in your line linking Minerva and healing could have been more carefully constructed so as not to give the wrong impression :-)
It's not my fault if you made semantic and logical errors . It was a simple straightforward statement that I imagine most would have understood for what it was , and most importantly , not introduced an imaginary concept into the reading .
|