"It's the dowsers embodied consciousness that is the conduit for these energies"
- assumption 1.?
"which ultimately results in the rods being moved"
- assumption 2. ?
"Like much of what is really important ,science is unable to account for this too"
- assumption 3. ? (Actually, Science DOES have a theory on why the rods move).
"it works"
Ah, that's assumption 4, which is much more respectable than the other three as it's based on observation, not nothing. Should we talk about that rather than the rest as it's a sine qua non of the thread.
(As for leys, do they only exist if they are discovered or are they everywhere?)
|