I would love to know your thoughts but fully understand your position.
Thanks: Difficult this because I know I'm not trying to find the solution to a monument, because I generate what should exist first then go looking to see if it exists. The first one, Stonehenge, was just found by accident; wasn't even looking to see if anyone else had done it because our own (quite extensive) searches, and the Patent Office search, had shown that no-one else had done it. Wouldn't have ever bothered to look any further if it hadn't been for stumbling across the SH monument and thinking that it all looked very familiar.
But I still don't really know if it's just me fitting monuments to suit the pattern: It's easy to convince yourself that you've discovered something when you haven't (and there's plenty of Stonehenge theorists who are much surer of their theories than I am of mine)
Cheers!
Jon
|