=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments'
Log In to post a reply
120 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tjj
tjj
3606 posts

Re: Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments'
Dec 01, 2012, 21:12
dean dean wrote:
modern? ancient? fake? folly? real? genuine? a stone circle is a stone circle is a stone circle. a piece of art is a piece of art. it depends in what spirit it was created as to how it can be perceived. people build circles for the veneration of mother nature. i dont care when they're built because it's all about 'feeling' and truth. warmest regards. Dean


Hello Dean Dean, thank you for your good spirited post - I'm tempted to say yes I agree a stone circle is a stone circle - whatever! Lots of examples apart from the one in Wantage (mentioned in my initial post). There is an impressive reconstructed stone circle at Stanton Harcourt in Oxfordshire; another recently constructed one in Dorset commissioned by the owner of Lush. Bladup (Paul Blades) built one in Lincoln but the council dismantled it - I'm sure there are loads more examples.

These cannot be categorised with prehistoric stone circles though can they? No stone circles appear to have been built in Northern Europe after 1,500BC and the oldest existing European stone circle dates back to 4,000BC* - it is their age, mystery and, more often than not, their setting that sets them apart. Modern 'works of art' can only mimic them.

* Cromelque Des Almedres in Portugal
In reply to:
Re: Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments' (dean dean)		 Replies:
Re: Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments' (dean dean)
Re: Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments' (thesweetcheat)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index