Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments'
Log In to post a reply

120 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tjj
tjj
3606 posts

Re: Modern memorials as 'ancient monuments'
Oct 01, 2012, 08:43
Hob wrote:
No offence taken, none at all. I've been pondering, and have concluded there ought to be some kind of overt sign in a modern repro, some element of the thing, be it a carving, a standing stone or earthwork, that makes direct reference to it's otherness when compared to it's ancient counterpart.

Millenium stones all seem to have the date on them, modern stones are usually easily discernable by the lack of weathering, and earthworks would all have totally different stratigraphy from old ones, but despite this, the only common method of identifying new carvings seems to be by the methods discussed here, i.e. by recording. Ideally, a photo of the rock surface before carving and after carving. That would be difficult for anyone to get mixed up with.


Thank you! I won't pretend I didn't feel uncomfortable about raising this as I know the high regard with which Jan is held, and that your carving is part of the
Jan Brouwer Trail (hope to walk it myself in the not too distant future). 'The Eternal' made the same point in his post - call me a worrier (not a warrior) but I always think 'what if ...' the internet disappeared. I would put my faith in traditional methods of recording i.e. some small symbol on the rock face which marks it 'of its time'.
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index