=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
What's acceptable when interacting with sites?
Log In to post a reply
141 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Sanctuary
Sanctuary
4670 posts

Re: What's acceptable when interacting with sites?
May 16, 2011, 22:16
tjj wrote:
You seem to have covered most aspects Nicki, there is also this charter which is basic common sense
http://www.stone-circles.org.uk/stone/charter.htm

I have noticed that English Heritage are also putting something on their information boards about prohibiting unauthorised metal detecting at sites they are responsible for. Its easy to forget about issues such as erosion which is a big problem at Avebury and on West Kennet Long Barrow as people always walk on the banks and to the end of the long barrow.


Walking all over the WKLB infuriates me yet it is tolerated it would seem. Place one foot on Silbury however and you're shot at dawn! Is there/should there be a difference? I feel not, although I have admitted in the past to climbing the hill twice when a lot younger, but I've never trampled over the barrow ever!
In reply to:
Re: What's acceptable when interacting with sites? (tjj)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index