> Ok, fair enough. But it's not about Thee Stones is it?
If that's a serious problem, then I expect he'll get banned eventually.
> And he's a good enough self publicist without us helping him.
Well there's two important points here. Firstly, people from TMA were quick enough to form a lynch mob and head off over to Mike's message board a while ago to leave threatening and insulting messages. Now whether you believe that was justified or not, it's not exactly the sort of behaviour that's likely to discourage him from responding in kind. You reap what you sow.
Secondly, I've been advocating that people ignore Mike rather than getting wound up by him for a long time, but that advice appears to have fallen on deaf ears up until now. If people are going to respond to him, then I'd rather do so politely and constructively, hence my conversation.
> (carry on if you like, of course - I don't want an argument)
Aww, go on! Actually, I prefer discussions as a rule. Arguments just result in people not listening to each other.
|