Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
For Ceremonial purposes?
Log In to post a reply

127 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: For Ceremonial purposes?
Aug 18, 2013, 17:52
Littlestone wrote:
tiompan wrote:
Without science we would still be thinking these monuments were built by the Mycenaens , Druids or Romans...

Putative alignments have never been discovered by astrologers of any ilk , the Stonehenge alignment was first noted by Stukeley who used scientific methods in his work and was a fellow of the Royal Society .


You forget that Kepler and Galileo were court astrologers, and that without their pioneering work astronomy, as we now know it, would not exist. Stukeley may have been a Fellow of the Royal Society but he was also a clergyman, described himself as a Druid and was interested in Freemasonry ;-)

It’s all too easy to dismiss areas of study such as acupuncture, astrology, dowsing etc as pseudosciences or, in your own words a, “...type of arrogance [that] we might expect from astrologers and woo merchants...” while forgetting the foundation work men (and women) from all ages and all cultures have laid down. More importantly we may be forgetting the true meaning of the word 'science' – ie a, “Knowledge acquired by study; acquaintance with or mastery of a department of learning.” (OED).



You forget that you are entirely unaware of what I know of Kepler and Galileo and hence what I can " forget " about them .Similarly the OED definition of science .
Of course the work of alchemists and astrologers led to chemistry and astronomy , with the abandonment of their central principles along the way , but that doesn't mean that pseudosciences have contributed anything to our understanding of prehistoric monuments .
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index