Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
Guess what verdict the cop got
Log In to post a reply

52 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
pooley
pooley
501 posts

Re: Guess what verdict the cop got
Apr 07, 2010, 16:26
Merrick wrote:
pooley wrote:
Do you equally hate a protester that uses a peaceful protest as an opportunity to bash a few coppers heads?


I do despise the idea that attacking cops is some sort of useful or worthy activity in and of itself, yes. The cops are not the enemy, they are its guard dogs.

But to answer the particular wording of the question, it depends on the specific situation, what the coppers are there to do on that day.

Frankly, I have more respect for violence from fascist street thugs than violence from cops. The fascists believe in something, the cops are just fighting for what other people believe in. Their violence is to maintain the rules written down by others, irrespective of their wisdom.

I cannot respect someone who would use whatever violence it took to enforce obedience to a rule then, when the rule is changed to its polar opposite, that same person uses the same coercion to enforce the new rule.

It's either a complete blind faith in those making the rules, or a belief that obedience to authority is the most important thing.

pooley wrote:
Would you defend the copper being targeted by a knob head protester (there are a few) with as much gusto as you would protect a protester being clobbered by a copper?


Again, I would decry it, but not to the same degree. The cops has been entrusted with a higher position, given arms and armour. So the same behaviour from them is a worse crime.


Merrick, friend, I find a lot of your answer disturbing, and morally questionable (to say the least)

Are you really saying that it is ok to bash someones head because you believe in something and they dont?

Are you really saying that (in some situations) coppers deserve to get a kicking just because they are coppers, doing their jobs?

Also, I dont get why you think police have to believe in every rule they enforce? Wouldn't that mean sacking all the coppers, and hiring new ones every time a law, major or minor, is changed?? Isn't that insane?


How can you expect agood honest policeman to agree with every single law passed?

Every job makes hypocrites of us. Every job has things we agree with, and things we dont - that's life.

I work in publishing - some books that we publish, I actively despise - should I forbid their publication?

Should Doctors who disagree with under age sex not put young girls on the pill?

Or maybe that same Doctor does not like gays - should he not treat them?
Topic Outline:

U-Know! Forum Index