=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Slaggyford Stones »
Slaggyford Stones .
Log In to post a reply
170 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: Veni, Vide, Nil Vici
Sep 13, 2011, 21:35
StoneGloves wrote:
The location data for this ring-marked stone - as it appears in the TMA .KMZ file - is fairly close. It is noticeable that as soon as you have produced a result - rough you described it as before you did the calculation - that favours my assumption of a stone row, then you drop it 'like a hot brick'. Which clearly demonstrates negative bias, or prejudice.


Maybe if you would get your info corect it might help .I worked out the astronomy then when posted here you suddenly realise it wasn't Kip Law after all , more mistakes . Rather than point out yet another mistake I thought I'd give you a break or you would only complain about being bullied or being conspired against . A line of stones does not a stone row make .
In reply to:
Veni, Vide, Nil Vici (StoneGloves)		 Replies:
Re: Vised (StoneGloves)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index