=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Slaggyford Stones »
Slaggyford Stones .
Log In to post a reply
170 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Sanctuary
Sanctuary
4670 posts

Re: Slaggyford Stones .
Sep 11, 2011, 06:30
nigelswift wrote:
Of course not, but that's no reason to theorise the Avenues are fallopian tubes either. Such a proposal would merit the description "cobblers" wouldn't it?


Stick to the hill Nigel. Everything is a theory when it comes to it. There are many people out there that believe it could be a representation of a womb/uterus and put a reasonable case forward for it without the need for it to be described as utter cobblers. Should we call any theories you have as utter cobblers as well even though you also can’t prove anything but are nevertheless sincere in your beliefs?
Like you I also believe the hill was built to a blueprint although Jim Leary doesn’t in his rather good book ‘The Story of Silbury Hill’. Do we now call his idea cobblers as well? Just be fair.
In reply to:
Re: Slaggyford Stones . (nigelswift)		 Replies:
Re: Slaggyford Stones . (StoneGloves)
Re: Slaggyford Stones . (nigelswift)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index