=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Slaggyford Stones »
Slaggyford Stones .
Log In to post a reply
170 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: More Slaggyford Stones ...
Sep 11, 2011, 14:20
StoneGloves wrote:
Now that you have shown that the rock art surveyors did find one of my stones, and comparison of their and my map references are close enough to be the same place, would you be so kind as to request that the 'of disputed antiquity' label be lifted. Thanks. If you don't like the term 'standing stones' then perhaps you could ask that it be changed to 'rock art'.


The "disputed antiquity " is perfectly appropraite for the pics under that banner. These sites have no rock art .

The cobble that has part of it's description as "The regularity of shape and grouping arrangement promotes this as an artificially marked stone." is not one of the pics .
If one stone in an area is considered rock art that does not mean that other non engraved stones should be considered the same .
In reply to:
More Slaggyford Stones ... (StoneGloves)		 Replies:
Re: More Slaggyford Stones ... (StoneGloves)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index