Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Slaggyford Stones »
Slaggyford Stones .
Log In to post a reply

170 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Sanctuary
Sanctuary
4670 posts

Re: Slaggyford Stones .
Sep 09, 2011, 09:22
tiompan wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
tiompan wrote:
They certainly don't look like cup marks of any description . Those holes are quite common and are often confused with cup marks . I could post examples of local ones . Cup marks tend to be like inverted cones whilst these have sharper edges with the sides being more vertical rather than sloping . They don't look like standing stones either .


Hi George,
Are many of those natural recumbent stones (as against those that are known to have fallen) we see with cup marks in various other locations ever lifted to see if they have any on the underside?


Hi Roy ,there has been some limited excavations in this country around marked boulders that are not bed rock (be rock ahs been excavated too ) but none have been inverted unless they were small enough .In the cases of genuine standing stones still standing with markings there are examples where both sides have been marked .The sequence is intriguing enough when the markings are on one side i.e. was the rock marked in situ then quarried and erected , the most likely sequence , or quarried then marked .When the markings are on both sides ,(sometimes the sides of the stones too therefore 3or 4 sides as is the case at Nether largie ) clearly on one side could have been done in situ but the stone could then have been turned over .


Thanks George. I find myself looking out for examples now, something I've never done before!! Judging by all your reports you certainly have a 'nose' for finding it!! Well done you.
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index