nigelswift wrote:
I also think this feels right. The strengthened paths at the Rollrights with grass growing through them are zero aesthetic problem. And of course, such a path wouldn't be interfering with archaeology, whereas strengthening the path on the hill would. But best of all is the fact the public would protect the hill by becoming Shame Wardens. ;)
Yes, it's done really well at the Rollrights. Again, it feels right, unobtrusive and in harmony with the place (as much as it can be).
|