Evergreen Dazed wrote: Astralcat wrote: Discussion should allow opposing views without this continual onus on evidence/proof, especially in such diverse and fringe areas eg. the 'paranormal' v current scientific theory.
But if evidence/proof cannot be grasped in these fringe areas, how can you say its 'fact'?
Is it that you've just decided its fact to your own satisfaction?
If so, i'm afraid that doesn't make it a fact at all.
Its your belief.
Of course it's my belief, and therefore my personal fact. Doesn't have to be yours or anyone else's.
|