Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much?
This topic is locked

253 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Astralcat
Astralcat
742 posts

Re: [Off topic]
Nov 10, 2013, 08:05
Mustard wrote:
Astralcat wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Astralcat wrote:
Mustard wrote:
Astralcat wrote:
It's like the underlying fundamentalism and aggression of the Dawkins mob, it's not that you may have a different viewpoint/perspective, like Rupert Sheldrake for instance, you're 'an ENEMY of reason', and ENEMY. How odd. It happens all the time. I have a keen interest and alternative/complimentary medicine, but the raised hackles and immediate assumption that I'm nut job who hates mainstream medicine and science (both utter bollocks) is so predictable. Open discussion is rarely possible. It's loaded and one sided, even to the point of arrogantly and contemptuously dismissing the philosophies and practices of other cultures. I am not by the way, making references to particular individuals here, more the fact that there's is so much more to know in many areas. It's not about indiscriminate dismantling, it's about investigating and adding knowledge. Unfortunately, that's very hard with the current paradigm, as there main body of the scientific community has become hopelessly entwined with corporate and political interests and funding. We need brave thinkers and pioneers in so many areas, now more than ever, and I honestly believe that it's starting to happen.

I think all of those comments would be entirely fair if you approached these conversations as discussions, rather than asserting your experiences as objective truths. I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm open-minded about many things, but I am not receptive to people who TELL me how it is.

I don't, I stand by what I have found. That's different.

No, it really isn't. And that's exactly the stubborn insistence that causes the problems in these discussions. You complain that others aren't open minded, yet you yourself are closed minded to the possibility that you are mistaken or incorrect in "what you have found".


If I showed it to it would spoil the magic.

As I said, closed minded. I accept that dowsing might work, you don't accept that it might not work. Who is closed minded?


I find it very interesting indeed that I have posted two links re. the closed ranks and minds towards two highly intelligent and qualified members of their own community with differing views. I mentioned the Dawkins/Sheldrake incident to a friend of mine who is a keen Dawkins supporter, and even he was disappointed calling the attitude 'very bad science. Not scientific at all'. This blanket and blinkered stance ignoring of evidence that proves the prevailing attitude is quite staggering and typical.
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index