Julian Cope presents Head Heritage | The Modern Antiquarian Forum | Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much?

The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much?	This topic is locked

253 messages	Topic View: Flat \| Threaded

tiompan

5758 posts

Re: Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much?

Nov 06, 2013, 14:42

[quote="jonmor"]Bloody hell George: K15. How could you possibly guess that?

Dowsing . (gets coat)

I have no idea what qualifies as a reasonable evidence set for this purpose so don't know how it'll be seen:

That's what is of interest ,a clue to what the evidence might be .

K13 is absolutely fine, but a bit messy; almost as if someone wanted to bring everything they thought important into one, but didn't properly plan out how they were going to do that.

That is also of interest , what is the criteria that considers it messy ? , why assume what was important for the engraver(s) ? ,why assume that the engravings are representations of important concepts to the engraver and some might include more concepts than others ? why assume the engraving was pre-planned ?
Sorry lots of Q's , but hoping to get to the basis of it .

In reply to:
Re: Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much? (jonmor)

Replies:
[Off topic] (nigelswift)
Re: Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much? (jonmor)

Topic Outline:

Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much? – Sanctuary, Oct 14, 2013, 11:27


The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index