=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much?
This topic is locked
253 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
jonmor
jonmor
150 posts

Re: Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much?
Nov 06, 2013, 13:21
Bloody hell George: K15. How could you possibly guess that?

No idea who at this stage or even if it'll be of interest. Now that the Stonehenge set is more or less done, just offering out the idea like last time, but at a much slower pace: I had more time spare back then, but it still took three years! I have no idea what qualifies as a reasonable evidence set for this purpose so don't know how it'll be seen: I thought Combe Hill was very weak (even considered deleting it because it looked too speculative to me) but it seems to have been picked out by others as strong. K13 is absolutely fine, but a bit messy; almost as if someone wanted to bring everything they thought important into one, but didn't properly plan out how they were going to do that.
In reply to:
Re: Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much? (tiompan)		 Replies:
Re: Conclusions...Stone circles, are we learning much? (tiompan)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index