tiompan wrote: jonmor wrote: There's one complex motif that seems overly developed to my eyes.
Will let you know what response I get!
Jon , the use of “over developed “ seems inappropriate when we don’t know the intent , meaning , if any , or limits , is it not just more ornate or possessing a greater number of different motifs from others ? My guess is K 15 but 13 is arguably even more complex .
Can you say who is getting access to the idea to allow a response ?
From the archaeologists named and the other bits and pieces, got the site, can't wait to hear the theory.
|