Yes I see your point, getting someone to flesh out the whys and wherefores of a speculation could be useful in helping to discount/corroborate a theory - but of course, the bigger the thing gets, the more it needs to tie in at various points with actual evidence - else you end up with Discworld! (Is that how you spell it?)
This rang a big bell with me: "may never have been "fixed" to the surface in a way that would leave an archaeological record".... So what are we to make of Stukeley, called a liar for centuries for drawing the Beckhampton Ave so long, proved not a liar over six stones, but no record yet found of the others. Was he drawing relatively small stones placed on the surface that left no marks when removed?
|